2013年12月6日金曜日

Biden won’t ruin China visit over Japan

中国が英語ニュースWEBで世界への発信に力を入れ始めました。
これはバイデン米副大統領の訪中記事ですが、中国の自信と恐れ、
日本に対するスタンスなど、とても興味深い裏側が垣間見えます。
主張に脅しっぽさが交じるところも中国らしいです。
ニュースWEBのエディトリアルというより、政府広報、ステートメント色が強いですね。
「中国」という部分を「我が国」と読み替えてみると、それが良く解ります。
ヘタ訳ですので、誤訳、異訳、感想等、ご遠慮なくコメントどうぞ。

いつもは気に入った英文記事の非公開倉庫にしている場所です。
全文訳で著作権も心配ですので、10日ほどで非公開に戻します。


原文:Grobal Times China


バイデン副大統領は日本で主に中国の東シナ海での航空識別圏設定について話したようだが、中国では多くの話されるべき問題が山積していて、識別圏は単にその一つでしかない。
中国とアメリカの超大国同士の新しいタイプの関係は、アジア太平洋地域の長期にわたる平和と安定の基本である。その中米協力の戦略的重要性はひとつの問題の不一致に影響されるようなものではない。最近の東シナ海の緊張は日本が同情を得ようと引き起こしたものだ。

中国は日本と日米の軍事同盟を刺激する意図はないが、日本はわざと危機を演出してアメリカを巻き込み、中国と米国の対立を作りだそうとしている。米国が中国の航空識別圏問題に反対なのは明らかだが、中国は中米がこの対立に上手く対処できると信じている。

中国、米国、アジア太平洋地域、そして全世界も中米がパートナーになる事を求めている。両国が公然と強く対立すれば(世界の)悪夢なのだから。
日米関係は中米関係にとって重要な要素ではない。
国と米国の互いの重要性は、日米同盟における日本の役割になんら影響されるものではないのだ。

両国のリーダーシップにおいて経済問題やイラン、北朝鮮などの政治問題は協議されただろうが、日中問題では大した時間は割かれなかっただろう。
バイデン副大統領が敵として中国訪問に現れたなどという事はあり得ないし、もしそうなら、中国は遠慮しない。

中米関係を深める鍵は戦略上の不信感を払拭する事だ。米国は中国社会に対して優しさを見せる事が大事であると認識すべきである。

中国が心配しているのは、米国が、中国と近隣諸国の領土問題を利用して中国をけん制、押さえようとすることであり、米国がアジアで中国を標的にするスタンスに立つ事が懸念されてきたのだ
中国の外交政策は人民の気持ちを重要視する。もし米国が本当に中国を抑えこむ意図が無いなら、中国の核心的利益に関わる地域で、争いを主導するようなことは避けるべきだ

米国は常に東アジアのバランスと自身の仲裁者としての役割について語ってきた。しかし、念頭に置いておかなければならないのは、中国の発展は東アジアの秩序への挑戦戦略というより、国の発展の自然な過程であるという事だ。
国が言うバランスは、中国の合理的な戦略的要求寛容であるべきで、米国は中国の近隣諸国との領土紛争に関わるべきではない。

中国人民はバイデン副大統領の訪問で米国流の考えを感じたかもしれない。米国大使館で中国学生と米政府高官を交えて行われた「米国の自由」についてのディスカッションは、まさに典型的な機会であった。
国人達は中国社会が国に高い要求をする訳ではない認識するだろう。
そして、中国のいわゆるナショナズムに対しても先入観を持つべきではない。
中国の様に、多くを要求しない、穏やかな社会が米国に対してナショナリズムを増大させるとき、彼らは適応し行動する必要があれば反応するだろう。

2013年11月27日水曜日

朴素ヨンさん Raptor22K Olibe89

http://japanese.joins.com/article/social_user.php?member_group_seq=uDhN.vpDS5&mem_type=yahoo

http://japanese.joins.com/article/social_user.php?member_group_seq=MHBYTJNBVY5LMGQGEM2MDOH3GQ




■誰でも気づくことですが、これは韓国側の全くの自分勝手な批判であることは確かでしょう。そもそもの始まりは韓国側の日本や日本人に対する何でも有り、のヘイトスピーチや日本を貶めるための言動に由来するものです。
 確かにヘイトスピーチそのものは批判されなくてはなりません。しかし自分たちは日本を貶めるためには何をしても良いが、自分たちがヘイトスピーチを受ける被害は世界中の国から日本が非難されなくてはならない、という考えは少なくとも日本では受け入れられないでしょう。
 自らの言動を差し置いて、日本が批判されるのが当たり前のような感覚は「真人間」のすることではないと知るべきでしょう。


■このような傾向は韓国人の全てと思う日本人も多いのですが、実はそうではありません。同じ「中央日報」の元東京特派員の善良な記者である朴素ヨンさん(素敵な女性です)がいます。このヘイトスピーチに関して彼女は次のように言っています。

〔ヘイトスピーチ〕は相手の自尊心を傷付け侮辱する言葉で在日や韓国人には日常語だ。野党幹部が朴大統領を批判する際に、日本の安倍首相を同列に取り上げ「二人とも生まれてきてはならなかった」と決め付けた。朴大統領の悪口は韓国内で済んでも、大国日本の安倍首相への個人攻撃は日本人には看過できない国際問題レベルの憎悪の発言です。謝罪すべきでしょう。2013-07-14

■韓国では安倍首相への個人攻撃ばかりでなく、安倍首相の人形も何度も燃やされています。また日の丸も破られて燃やされたり、日本の国鳥であるキジも生きたままナイフで切り刻まれています。

■朴素ヨンさんは、この記事を書いた金玄基(キム・ヒョンギ)東京総局長については次のように書いています。どのような人物か想像がつくと思います。

〔金玄基の場合〕支社長のキャバクラ通いは日報社内だけでなく読者にも広く知れ渡っている。強面で闇社会にも顔が利き、夜ごと丸太ん棒を振り回している。「医者に行くよりキャバクラ行け、薬買うより女買え」元気溌剌、HN:Luckyman幸せ男の盲信的信条です。そんな彼にホントの事を言った橋下市長を「妄言の終着点」と非難する資格はあるのでしょうか。2013-05-21

http://japanese.joins.com/article/social_article.php?total_id=171828&pgi=2&refer=japanese.joins.com%2Farticle%2Fj_article.php%3Faid

■韓国にはごく少数ではありますが、朴素ヨンさんのような冷静で理性的な物事の判断のできる人物が確かにいます。
 彼女は韓国の良心と言って良いでしょう。
 私たちは、「反日教育」で洗脳されている韓国民から、このような人格を見つけるのはなかなか困難ですが、地道な努力で彼女のような「良心的な韓国人」が増えるよう努力すべきでしょう。


■以下に彼女の発した珠玉の名言を掲載したいと思います。もっと見たい方は以下のアドレスへ。



〔暑中お見舞い申し上げます〕韓国は梅雨末期の大雨。日本は猛暑が続いています、お体に気を付けて下さい。朴大統領の執拗な反日発言、日本が竹島や慰安婦問題で韓国の主張を受入れない姿勢に苛立っているのでしょう。元大統領を父親に持ちながら政治外交センスは期待外れ。電力不足、反日熱病で脳内過熱、暴走の韓国指導者達に「反日お見舞い申し上げます」2013-07-14

〔淪落司法〕ソウル高裁は戦時日本で働いた朝鮮人の未払賃金に支払判決を出した。この種の請求は昭和40年日韓請求権協定の莫大な経済援助(慰謝料)で最終的かつ完全に解決とした二国間外交文書への違反です。法治国家とも思えぬ反日裁判ショー、原告は韓国政府に請求すべき事。なのに冷静な批判・見解が韓国内で湧き上がらない・・そんな国なのです。2013-07-14

〔中韓同舟の異夢〕深刻な経済減速が現実的に進行する中国に輸出額の3割を依存する韓国。政治体制・主義の異なる両国の連携は相互補完と言うより、何れ破綻し沈没を早める双胴船に見えます。中国の反日デモも下手に画策すると反政府暴動に繋がりかねず、韓国の歴史認識発言も日本の反発と、中韓の国民性を覚醒させただけの結果でした。 2013-07-14

〔東京ラブレター〕韓国の執拗な歴史認識発言を機に韓日関係が軋んでいる。歴史を淘汰し外交を勝ち負け、駆け引きでなく内容を重視すれば未来志向になると思う。反日・嫌韓の慣性の法則に流されず、情報メタボを改善、己の気持に湧き上がる志、真心をぶつけ合えば相手も尊重し共感が得られるはず。短期的には否定的でも長期的には楽観的、肯定的に考えたい。 2013-07-11

〔中国の韓国を眺める眼〕韓国は国力、地政学的に自立できる国でなく常に周囲の大国、日米中露を天秤にかけ、その威を借る事大主義の国です。世界から孤立し経済失速が囁かれる中国に接近する韓国は奇異に映ります。中国から見れば四面楚歌の状態で自分になびく韓国は可愛いでしょう。が、内心では韓国を嫌い軽蔑、長年の属国根性を知り尽くしているからです。 2013-07-01

〔尋牛〕朴大統領は手帳姫と呼ばれるが、側近達はデスノートと恐れている。自分の見解に埋もれ開かれた議論そのものを拒否する姿がいたわしい。こんな偏狭な姿は韓国政治の日常風景だ。暴れ狂う馬、疑心暗鬼の猿と対照的に牛は1カ所に傾かず清く本質を見通す心性を持つ。韓国社会を導く人々が清心の水準に至らずも、韓国未来の為、牛を探す期待をしてみたい。 2013-07-02

〔悪徳の使者〕これもその一種ですが、韓国は日本貶めに米国で慰安婦問題や議会での非難決議などロビー活動を国策として行っている。米国人ロビーストは本来、韓日問題の当事者でもないのに、何故か日本非難時には顔を出してくる。韓国側に立ち日本糾弾する前に米国自身への調査・反省が筋。それに目をつむるのは金で魂を売った韓国の工作人たる証明です。 2013-07-03


※ひろへらのコメント 超名言です。
航空機、車、健康など定期点検・診断が行われるが、自分の志・人生観を職場や家庭において己の立ち向かう姿勢で点検してる人は自分を含め少ないでしょう。自己点検により現在の境遇が自分の心や行動の反映であると分る。己を客観的に省みる事で正しい方向への軌道修正や境遇・進路を切り拓く事が出来る。自己点検、デスクの客観点検が決定的に欠けた記事ですね。2013-06-13

〔日本の復活・韓国の脱落に万感〕安倍総理の配慮を読み取れず、対日外交に躓いた朴政権。日本が円安・株高など「アベノミクス」効果で経済復興し、台湾・東南アジアなど近隣友好国とより絆を強める一方、尖閣・竹島、日本の主権を侵犯する中韓からどんどん遠ざかる間、我々は韓日関係の為にどんな努力を傾ければいいのか、自問してみる時である。 2013-06-12

〔日報報道、そして韓国の現実〕歴史を眺める正しい視線は消えていき、知覚の無い一部の反日扇動者が出す無理な主張や歴史歪曲が勢力を振う韓国。その隣国の事態を憂慮と迷惑の視線で眺めるしかなかった日本。安倍政権は捏造歪曲の欺瞞を否定、極右の烙印を恐れず正理正論で対抗している。正義なき力は暴力、力なき正義は無力、両方とも無いのが韓国の現実だ。2013-06-10

〔万華鏡の日報〕政治経済、社会、芸能スポーツ・・連日、反日を国是社是にギラギラした記事が掲載される。まるで万華鏡を覗いているようです。束の間の陶酔が得られるが、望遠鏡の様に遠くを見る訳でもなく、虫眼鏡の様に手元を拡大観察する物でもなく、現実逃避の蜃気楼です。韓国の厳しい現実、将来を洞察するに、先ず等身大の自分を鏡に映して欲しいです。2013-06-10

〔和顔愛語〕穏やかで親しみやすい振舞い。韓日の発言・報道、特に韓国側に倫理性を欠いた偏見が見られる。なされた事へお返しの感情を「返報性の原理」という。日本では鶴の恩返しなど暖かい情操教育がなされる反面、韓国では幼児期から異常な反日教育、ヨンピルも紅白で恨500年を歌い、朴大統領は恨1000年を叫ぶ。恨からの脱却が友好の礎と感じます。2013-06-04

〔素ヨンの警鐘〕沙韻の鐘、実話なんですね、日台の友情は羨ましい限り、韓日はどこで釦を掛け違えたのでしょう。理不尽な日本叩きを繰返し報道すると無関心な日本人も竹島、慰安婦など虚偽、虚報と気付きます。日本には「大衆は愚かでない」との感覚があり、真実を瞬時に見透かす能力がある。韓国にもまともな分析、世論形成が育たないとこの国は本当に危うい。 2013-05-30

〔心打つ使命〕仕事の目的は世のため人のため自分のためであり、生き甲斐の創造でもある。仕事を通して志が遂げられれば、こんな幸福はない。使命とは己の責務を全うする時、浮き彫りになるが真の使命に出会うのは稀だ。ここ数日の日報報道は使命を忘れ、曲解した度を過ぎた反日報道で信用を失った。読者の心に共感を残す、心打つ記事を書いていきたい。 2013-05-24

〔慰安婦悲話〕カスバの女、飾り窓の女、赤線地帯、韓国のテキサス村、現実に世界のあらゆる時代、場所に浜の真砂の如く慰安婦、売春婦は存在した。ベトナムでは3万人の韓国混血児が暴行強姦で残され韓国はベトナムに公式謝罪していない。日本だけ非難する道理は無い。問題の本質はオスの生理。理性の立入る範疇でなく、女性には表向き触れて欲しくない機微です。2013-05-22

〔中韓つむじ風〕日本参院選を前に中韓連合の嫌がらせ・挑発行為が目立っている。尖閣水域への侵入、東シナ海ガス田、ヘイトスピーチ等、やりたい放題に見えます。高飛車の日本脅しが今回も有効と盲信。危機感の創出は安倍政権への追い風になり打撃になりません。中韓は多くの工作人を日本に潜入させながら日本人の民意を取り違え世論が読めていません。 2013-07-05

②工作人は野中、鳩山氏を取り込み中国寄り発言を演出したが、逆に日本国内に嫌中感情を高めた。孫子の兵法や三国志の諸葛孔明など戦略のお手本があるのに歴史を学ぶ事が出来ません。中国は1996年、台湾総統選の李総統優勢を牽制に軍事演習を実施。結果は台湾人を結束させ李総統援護の風になった。同じ失敗を繰り返すつもりでしょうか。2013-07-05

③文化大革命の影響なのか、今の中国指導者世代の多くが真面目に世界の歴史、中日韓の歴史を勉強したと思えません。「正しい歴史認識を持て、歴史を鑑とせよ」言葉と裏腹に客観的歴史認識はありません。韓国も全く同じです。日本に「首脳会談やってあげないもん」主導権を握ってるかの如き稚戯が浅慮・逆効果のつむじ風と気が付かないのでしょうか。2013-07-05

〔夢のふるさと〕変わらぬものは紫紺の空を流れる雲、富士山・桜に育まれた日本の気高く優しき心。愛国心や使命感が相手を貶める抗生物質、幻影と気付くのに時間はかからなかった。歴史も環境も異なる世界の国々が最終的に収斂するのは日本的心、文化に思える。嵐に志が乱れても、血潮に靴が破れても、夢と本分を忘れずに求道の道を歩みたい。 2013-06-24

2013年10月16日水曜日

24-6-6b

  • It may have something to do with what happened in Tokyo
  • I'd like you to tender your resignation.
  • The case you're referring to, if I remember correctly....
  • It's just a little grayer than that now, isn't it?
  • You sequestered that file to protect your husband.
  • Nevertheless, one of these man is still trying to fight against us.
  • Dou you wanna get in the ring with me?
  • you've got skeletons in your closet, and I will not hesitate to pull them out.
  • How long before you get the documents
    (How long will it take that you get the documents)
  • How long before (the/a) concert should i get there.
  • I barely made the train.
  • I just missed the train
  • You're son of a bitch / I never claimed otherwise.
  • I am sorry that I keep you waitingI am sorry that I've kept you waiting..


Abbott Puts A Gag On Australia




Abbott Puts A Gag On Australia

By Costa Avgoustinos

Tony Abbott's government is hushing up academics, human rights defenders - even their own ministers. Whose right to free speech do they actually stand for, asks Costa Avgoustinos
The Coalition Government has only been in power a month, but despite professing “freedom of speech” as a core belief, and The Australian declaring that Tony Abbott PM would “champion free speech”, our right to freely discuss the government, foreign governments and business is being hit from several angles.
Academics wishing to freely criticise the Coalition government may be hampered by a new policy of defunding research it deems “ridiculous”. Catriona Jackson, chief executive of peak research body Science and Technology Australia, said that, “Australians should ask: Do we want politicians picking and choosing which grant proposals deserve funding?” Indeed, how is our government to be kept in check if our best minds are afraid to criticise it lest it hurt their livelihood?
Australians wishing to speak freely about other countries’ governments may also face serious consequences. To impress Indonesia, for example, Tony Abbott announced that his government “will do everything that [it] possibly can to discourage” those campaigning for West Papuan independence. Few doubt that Indonesia has committed human rights abuses against West Papuans, and the independence movement is a response to a situation that some have compared to genocide.
The Coalition government has also promised to cut funding to anyone who merely expresses support for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign. This is a campaign aimed at ending Israeli apartheid in a similar way to how boycotts, divestments and sanctions were used to end South African apartheid in the 1980s – non-violently through economic pressure.
Australians should not be punished for non-violent methods of protest. Indeed, three eminent Jewish-Australian academics, who themselves oppose the BDS campaign, have come out in support of BDS campaigners’ rights to free speech, labelling the Coalition government’s policy “outrageous’ and “anti-democratic”.
Consumers will also be penalised for promoting secondary boycotts of unethical companies. Initially the focus will be on environmental campaigns, but the ban could well extend to other types of boycotts. The details so far are unclear. We can vote out bad governments. Bad companies, however, only respond to hits to their bottom line, and bad PR. As Chris Berg from the Institute of Public Affairs suggests, “Sometimes the way we spend our money is literally a form of speech”.
The Coalition’s asylum seeker policy, Operation Sovereign Borders, has put information about refugees and asylum seekers under military strictures. Asylum seekers’ access to legal support will also be cut, limiting their access to our tribunals and courts and the ablity of our legal representatives to speak for them.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are being silenced in their own communities (with the planned abolition of “scores of statutory indigenous governance bodies") and in the courts (with the planned cuts to Aboriginal legal services). Debate on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement has been conducted secretly, but leaks reveal it might infringe on Australian internet users’ rights. Tony Abbott’s own ministers have also had their permission to talk to the media without approval from the Prime Minister’s office curtailed.
Even the Prime Minister seems to be self-silencing by keeping media appearances to a minimum; he has fled the media when quizzed on boat sinkings and shuts down when questioned. How can the public be properly informed on important issues if the players involved cannot be heard?
So after all these free speech attacks, why did News Ltd claim Tony Abbott would “champion” free speech? At least one reason is the Coalition government’s plan to scrap section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which offers legal relief to people who are offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated based on their race or ethnicity where the speaker was not acting reasonably or in good faith. News Ltd columnist Andrew Bolt was found to have breached this section in a 2011 Federal Court decision.

If, after putting limits on Australians’ right to engage with the business of government, the main feather in the Coalition’s free speech cap is their willingness to allow the majority to demonise minorities, it seems fair to conclude that the only speech the Coalition is interested in protecting is that of the rich, the white and the powerful.

24-6-6

Look, I'm not some idealistic flag burner
過激な理想主義者じゃない

Once you start ethnic profiling, It's a slippery slope.
宗教差別を始めたら、止まらない。

I'll look into it.
しらべるよ

Probably start with Tom, This has his name written all over it.

He treats the Constitution like a list of suggestion.

You don't like Tom and you never have.

I hope I got through to him.

obstructing official business.

We shouldn't come here....

I don't wanna hurt you but I will unless you do exactly what I say.

Well, However you may choose to characterise it,...

Is it that you think I'm some bleeding-heart liberal Preaching civil libertied? Is that it?

Constitution is a wonderful thing, but back in the days of the founding fathers, the weapon at hand a single-shot musket.

She's been flagged by police.

for crying out loud. なんてこった!

You are wasting your breath.

The problem is one of my best people is hamstrung.

It's paranoid delusions




2013年9月18日水曜日

Supreme Court Rules on Three Major Rights Issues


From VOA Learning English, this is In the News.

The United States Supreme Court made decisions on three major rights cases this week.

On Monday the court released a decision on education policy for minorities. But, the high court chose not to give a final ruling on the policy known as affirmative action.

The case involves a young white womanAbigail Fisherwho was rejected by the University of Texas.Her lawyers argued that universities should not be permitted to consider race when trying to accept adiverse class of studentsThey said that considering someone’s race in the admissions process violates their constitutional right to equal protection under the law.

Seven of the nine justices voted to return the case to a lower court saying it had not fully studied theuniversity’s actions.

Opponents praised the Supreme Court for ordering the lower court to enforce a narrower version of the school’s affirmative action planCivil rights activists welcomed the decision because it did not cancel the policy.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court did cancel a part of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Congress passed the law to ensure thatAfrican Americans in southern states could vote. The court decision ends federal supervision of election laws in states with ahistory of voter suppression.

The law was aimed at nine states and some cities and counties in seven other statesThese states were required to seekapproval from the Justice Department to make changes to their election lawsCongress has repeatedly extended the law,most recently in 2006.

divided court ruled by a vote of five to four. In the majority opinionChief Justice John Roberts wrote that widespreadviolation of the rights of black voters no longer exists. The majority ruled that the method used to decide which areas requirefederal supervision violates the rights of states. It said Congress must decide on a better method.

Several states announced they would begin new voting requirements that had been blocked by the Justice Department soonafter the ruling.

Cherilyn Infill is with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

Make no mistake about what has happened."

Speaking to a crowd near the court, she said the court has decided that it stands in a better position than Congress todetermine how to protect against voting discrimination.

“The 15th amendment to the constitution makes clear that it is Congress that has that power.”

On Wednesday morning, a different crowd waited outside the court buildingSupporters of same-sex marriage cheered whenthe Supreme Court canceled a federal and a state law on the issue.

The court said the 1996 federal law called the Defense of Marriage Act violated the rights of same-sex couples. The court saidthat the government could not prevent same-sex couples from getting the same taxhealth and retirement benefits astraditional husbands and wivesSupporters of the laws promised to continue efforts to limit marriage to legal unions of oneman and one woman.

And that’s In the News from VOA Learning English. I’m Steve Ember.

2013年8月23日金曜日

The confort woman issue

The U.S. official documents has clearly defined them by Interrogation during W.W.2nd. Aug.20-Sept.10,1944. Details:http://goo.gl/WF15t
"comfort girl" is nothing more than a prostitute or "professional camp follower" attached to the Japanese Army for the benefit of the soldiers.

Even though Korean people have been insisting that the confort woman issue is "human rights issue" and "exploitation of women's sex", this doesn't seem to me nothing more than haight activity affected by crazy enthusiasm based on their long time anti Japan education.
If they insist that this is the activity for comprehensive women's rights, not aiming slanderous defamation to Japan, How could they explain about korean domestic miserable situation on prostitution issue?  Watch out on your foot first! goo.gl/eRme09

2013年8月20日火曜日

Manal al-Sharif: A Saudi woman who dared to drive

Allow me to start this talk with a question to everyone. You know that all over the world, people fight for their freedom, fight for their rights. Some battle oppressive governments. Others battle oppressive societies. Which battle do you think is harder? Allow me to try to answer this question in the few coming minutes.
Let me take you back two years ago in my life. It was the bedtime of my son, Aboody. He was five at the time. After finishing his bedtime rituals, he looked at me and he asked a question:"Mommy, are we bad people?"
I was shocked. "Why do you say such things, Aboody?"
Earlier that day, I noticed some bruises on his face when he came from school. He wouldn't tell me what happened. [But now] he was ready to tell.
"Two boys hit me today in school. They told me, 'We saw your mom on Facebook. You and your mom should be put in jail.'"
I've never been afraid to tell Aboody anything. I've been always a proud woman of my achievements. But those questioning eyes of my son were my moment of truth, when it all came together. You see, I'm a Saudi woman who had been put in jail for driving a car in a country where women are not supposed to drive cars. Just for giving me his car keys, my own brother was detained twice, and he was harassed to the point he had to quit his job as a geologist, leave the country with his wife and two-year-old son. My father had to sit in a Friday sermon listening to the imam condemning women drivers and calling them prostitutes amongst tons of worshippers, some of them our friends and family of my own father. I was faced with an organized defamation campaign in the local media combined with false rumorsshared in family gatherings, in the streets and in schools. It all hit me. It came into focus that those kids did not mean to be rude to my son. They were just influenced by the adults around them. And it wasn't about me, and it wasn't a punishment for taking the wheel and driving a few miles. It was a punishment for daring to challenge the society's rules.
But my story goes beyond this moment of truth of mine. Allow me to give you a briefing about my story. It was May, 2011, and I was complaining to a work colleague about the harassments I had to face trying to find a ride back home, although I have a car and an international driver's license. As long as I've known, women in Saudi Arabia have been always complaining about the ban, but it's been 20 years since anyone tried to do anything about it, a whole generation ago.
He broke the good/bad news in my face. "But there is no law banning you from driving."
I looked it up, and he was right. There wasn't an actual law in Saudi Arabia. It was just a custom and traditions that are enshrined in rigid religious fatwas and imposed on women. That realization ignited the idea of June 17, where we encouraged women to take the wheel and go drive. It was a few weeks later, we started receiving all these "Man wolves will rape you if you go and drive." A courageous woman, her name is Najla Hariri, she's a Saudi woman in the city of Jeddah, she drove a car and she announced but she didn't record a video. We needed proof.
So I drove. I posted a video on YouTube. And to my surprise, it got hundreds of thousands of views the first day. What happened next, of course? I started receiving threats to be killed, raped, just to stop this campaign.
The Saudi authorities remained very quiet. That really creeped us out. I was in the campaign with other Saudi women and even men activists. We wanted to know how the authoritieswould respond on the actual day, June 17, when women go out and drive. So this time I asked my brother to come with me and drive by a police car. It went fast. We were arrested, signed a pledge not to drive again, released. Arrested again, he was sent to detention for one day, and I was sent to jail. I wasn't sure why I was sent there, because I didn't face any charges in the interrogation. But what I was sure of was my innocence. I didn't break a law, and I kept my abaya — it's a black cloak we wear in Saudi Arabia before we leave the house — and my fellow prisoners kept asking me to take it off, but I was so sure of my innocence, I kept saying,"No, I'm leaving today." Outside the jail, the whole country went into a frenzy, some attacking me badly, and others supportive and even collecting signatures in a petition to be sent to the king to release me. I was released after nine days.
June 17 comes. The streets were packed with police cars and religious police cars, but some hundred brave Saudi women broke the ban and drove that day. None were arrested. We broke the taboo.
(Applause)
So I think by now, everyone knows that we can't drive, or women are not allowed to drive, in Saudi Arabia, but maybe few know why. Allow me to help you answer this question.
There was this official study that was presented to the Shura Council -- it's the consultative council appointed by the king in Saudi Arabia — and it was done by a local professor, a university professor. He claims it's done based on a UNESCO study. And the study states, the percentage of rape, adultery, illegitimate children, even drug abuse, prostitution in countries where women drive is higher than countries where women don't drive.
(Laughter)
I know, I was like this, I was shocked. I was like, "We are the last country in the world where women don't drive." So if you look at the map of the world, that only leaves two countries:Saudi Arabia, and the other society is the rest of the world.
We started a hashtag on Twitter mocking the study, and it made headlines around the world.
[BBC News: 'End of virginity' if women drive, Saudi cleric warns]
(Laughter)
And only then we realized it's so empowering to mock your oppressor. It strips it away of its strongest weapon: fear.
This system is based on ultra-conservative traditions and customs that deal with women as if they are inferior and they need a guardian to protect them, so they need to take permission from this guardian, whether verbal or written, all their lives. We are minors until the day we die.And it becomes worse when it's enshrined in religious fatwas based on wrong interpretation of the sharia law, or the religious laws. What's worst, when they become codified as laws in the system, and when women themselves believe in their inferiority, and they even fight those who try to question these rules.
So for me, it wasn't only about these attacks I had to face. It was about living two totally different perceptions of my personality, of my person -- the villain back in my home country,and the hero outside.
Just to tell you, two stories happened in the last two years. One of them is when I was in jail.I'm pretty sure when I was in jail, everyone saw titles in the international media something like this during these nine days I was in jail.
But in my home country, it was a totally different picture. It was more like this: "Manal al-Sharif faces charges of disturbing public order and inciting women to drive."
I know.
"Manal al-Sharif withdraws from the campaign."
Ah, it's okay. This is my favorite.
"Manal al-Sharif breaks down and confesses: 'Foreign forces incited me.'"
(Laughter)
And it goes on, even trial and flogging me in public. So it's a totally different picture.
I was asked last year to give a speech at the Oslo Freedom Forum. I was surrounded by this love and the support of people around me, and they looked at me as an inspiration. At the same time, I flew back to my home country, they hated that speech so much. The way they called it: a betrayal to the Saudi country and the Saudi people, and they even started a hashtag called #OsloTraitor on Twitter. Some 10,000 tweets were written in that hashtag,while the opposite hashtag, #OsloHero, there was like a handful of tweets written. They even started a poll. More than 13,000 voters answered this poll: whether they considered me a traitor or not after that speech. Ninety percent said yes, she's a traitor. So it's these two totally different perceptions of my personality.
For me, I'm a proud Saudi woman, and I do love my country, and because I love my country, I'm doing this. Because I believe a society will not be free if the women of that society are not free. (Applause) Thank you. (Applause) Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you.(Applause)
Thank you.
But you learn lessons from these things that happen to you. I learned to be always there. The first thing, I got out of jail, of course after I took a shower, I went online, I opened my Twitter account and my Facebook page, and I've been always very respectful to those people who are opining to me. I would listen to what they say, and I would never defend myself with words only. I would use actions. When they said I should withdraw from the campaign, I filed the first lawsuit against the general directorate of traffic police for not issuing me a driver's license.There are a lot of people also -- very big support, like those 3,000 people who signed the petition to release me. We sent a petition to the Shura Council in favor of lifting the ban on Saudi women, and there were, like, 3,500 citizens who believed in that and they signed that petition. There were people like that, I just showed some examples, who are amazing, who are believing in women's rights in Saudi Arabia, and trying, and they are also facing a lot of hate because of speaking up and voicing their views.
Saudi Arabia today is taking small steps toward enhancing women's rights. The Shura Council that's appointed by the king, by royal decree of King Abdullah, last year there were 30 women assigned to that Council, like 20 percent. 20 percent of the Council. (Applause) The same time, finally, that Council, after rejecting our petition four times for women driving, they finally accepted it last February. (Applause) After being sent to jail or sentenced lashing, or sent to a trial, the spokesperson of the traffic police said, we will only issue traffic violation for women drivers. The Grand Mufti, who is the head of the religious establishment in Saudi Arabia, he said, it's not recommended for women to drive. It used to be haram, forbidden, by the previous Grand Mufti.
So for me, it's not about only these small steps. It's about women themselves.
A friend once asked me, she said, "So when do you think this women driving will happen?"
I told her, "Only if women stop asking 'When?' and take action to make it now."
So it's not only about the system, it's also about us women to drive our own life, I'd say.
So I have no clue, really, how I became an activist. And I don't know how I became one now.But all I know, and all I'm sure of, in the future when someone asks me my story, I will say, "I'm proud to be amongst those women who lifted the ban, fought the ban, and celebrated everyone's freedom."


2013年8月19日月曜日

河野内閣官房長官談話(含む:英文) 平成5年8月4日

慰安婦関係調査結果発表に関する
河野内閣官房長官談話
平成5年8月4日
 いわゆる従軍慰安婦問題については、政府は、一昨年12月より、調査を進めて来たが、今般その結果がまとまったので発表することとした。
 今次調査の結果、長期に、かつ広範な地域にわたって慰安所が設置され、数多くの慰安婦が存在したことが認められた。慰安所は、当時の軍当局の要請により設営されたものであり、慰安所の設置、管理及び慰安婦の移送については、旧日本軍が直接あるいは間接にこれに関与した。慰安婦の募集については、軍の要請を受けた業者が主としてこれに当たったが、その場合も、甘言、強圧による等、本人たちの意思に反して集められた事例が数多くあり、更に、官憲等が直接これに加担したこともあったことが明らかになった。また、慰安所における生活は、強制的な状況の下での痛ましいものであった。
 なお、戦地に移送された慰安婦の出身地については、日本を別とすれば、朝鮮半島が大きな比重を占めていたが、当時の朝鮮半島は我が国の統治下にあり、その募集、移送、管理等も、甘言、強圧による等、総じて本人たちの意思に反して行われた。
 いずれにしても、本件は、当時の軍の関与の下に、多数の女性の名誉と尊厳を深く傷つけた問題である。政府は、この機会に、改めて、その出身地のいかんを問わず、いわゆる従軍慰安婦として数多の苦痛を経験され、心身にわたり癒しがたい傷を負われたすべての方々に対し心からお詫びと反省の気持ちを申し上げる。また、そのような気持ちを我が国としてどのように表すかということについては、有識者のご意見なども徴しつつ、今後とも真剣に検討すべきものと考える。
 われわれはこのような歴史の真実を回避することなく、むしろこれを歴史の教訓として直視していきたい。われわれは、歴史研究、歴史教育を通じて、このような問題を永く記憶にとどめ、同じ過ちを決して繰り返さないという固い決意を改めて表明する。
 なお、本問題については、本邦において訴訟が提起されており、また、国際的にも関心が寄せられており、政府としても、今後とも、民間の研究を含め、十分に関心を払って参りたい。

 和文リンク

慰安婦関係調査結果発表に関する河野内閣官房長官談話

 英文 (外務省発表)

Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono
on the result of the study on the issue of "comfort women"
August 4, 1993
The Government of Japan has been conducting a study on the issue of wartime "comfort women" since December 1991. I wish to announce the findings as a result of that study.
As a result of the study which indicates that comfort stations were operated in extensive areas for long periods, it is apparent that there existed a great number of comfort women. Comfort stations were operated in response to the request of the military authorities of the day. The then Japanese military was, directly or indirectly, involved in the establishment and management of the comfort stations and the transfer of comfort women. The recruitment of the comfort women was conducted mainly by private recruiters who acted in response to the request of the military. The Government study has revealed that in many cases they were recruited against their own will, through coaxing coercion, etc., and that, at times, administrative/military personnel directly took part in the recruitments. They lived in misery at comfort stations under a coercive atmosphere.
As to the origin of those comfort women who were transferred to the war areas, excluding those from Japan, those from the Korean Peninsula accounted for a large part. The Korean Peninsula was under Japanese rule in those days, and their recruitment, transfer, control, etc., were conducted generally against their will, through coaxing, coercion, etc.
Undeniably, this was an act, with the involvement of the military authorities of the day, that severely injured the honor and dignity of many women. The Government of Japan would like to take this opportunity once again to extend its sincere apologies and remorse to all those, irrespective of place of origin, who suffered immeasurable pain and incurable physical and psychological wounds as comfort women.
It is incumbent upon us, the Government of Japan, to continue to consider seriously, while listening to the views of learned circles, how best we can express this sentiment.
We shall face squarely the historical facts as described above instead of evading them, and take them to heart as lessons of history. We hereby reiterated our firm determination never to repeat the same mistake by forever engraving such issues in our memories through the study and teaching of history.
As actions have been brought to court in Japan and interests have been shown in this issue outside Japan, the Government of Japan shall continue to pay full attention to this matter, including private researched related thereto.

 英文リンク

Statement by the Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono
on the result of the study on the issue of "comfort women"

2013年8月17日土曜日

South Korea,Prostitution

South Korea, a wealthy, powerful Asian super-state, technology hub and stalwart U.S. ally, has a deep, dark secret. Prostitution and the sex trade flourish in South Korea just under the country’s shiny surface.
Despite its illegality, prostitution and the sex trade is so huge that the government once admitted it accounts for as much as 4 percent of South Korea’s annual gross domestic product -- about the size of the fishing and agriculture industries combined.
Indeed, paid sex is available all over South Korea -- in coffee shops, shopping malls, the barber shop, hotels, motels, as well as the so-called juicy bars, frequented by American soldiers, and the red-light districts, which operate openly. Internet chat rooms and cell phones have opened up whole new streams of business for ambitious prostitutes and pimps.
The South Korean government’s Ministry for Gender Equality estimates that about 500,000 women work in the national sex industry, though, according to the Korean Feminist Association, the actual number may exceed 1 million. If that estimate is closer to the truth, it would mean that 1 out of every 25 women in the country is selling her body for sex -- despite the passage of tough anti-sex-trafficking legislation in recent years. (For women between the ages of 15 and 29, up to one-fifth have worked in the sex industry at one time or another, according to estimates.)
Indeed, the sex industry (in the face of laws criminalizing and stigmatizing it) is so open that prostitutes periodically stage public protests to express their anger over anti-prostitution laws. Bizarrely, like Tibetan monks protesting China’s brutal rule of their homeland, some Korean prostitutes even set themselves on fire to promote their cause.
Naturally, demand is high.
According to the government-run Korean Institute of Criminology, one-fifth of men in their 20s buy sex at least four times a month, creating an endless customer base for prostitutes.
Even worse, child and teen prostitution are also prevalent in South Korea.
Al-Jazeera reported that some 200,000 South Korean youths run away from home annually, with many of them descending into the sex trade, according to a report by Seoul’s municipal government. A separate survey suggested that half of female runaways become prostitutes.
All these statistics fly in the face of South Korea’s stellar image as a society that consistently produces brilliant, hard-working, motivated students and technocrats. However, it is precisely that academic pressure (along with other family issues) that drives many of these teens onto the streets.
"No one ever told me it was wrong to prostitute myself, including my schoolteachers,” a runaway named Yu-ja told Al-Jazeera.
“I wish someone had told me. Girls should be taught that from an early age in class here in South Korea, but they aren't."
Not only is South Korea home to child and teen prostitution, but South Korean men are also driving such illicit trade in foreign countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, according to the Korean Institute of Criminology, based on surveys conducted in Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and the Philippines.
“If the testimony from many underage prostitutes, police officers and human rights groups is true, South Koreans are the biggest customers of the child sex industry in the region,” their report stated, reported the Korea Times newspaper.
“That’s very shameful for [South Korea].”
Yun Hee-jun, a Seoul-based anti-sex trafficker, told the Times: “On online community websites, you can easily find information about prices for sex with minors and the best places to go. If you visit any brothel in Vietnam or Cambodia, you can see …  fliers written in Korean.”
The U.S. State Department, in the 2008 “Trafficking in Persons Report,” also blamed South Korean tourists for significantly driving the demand for underage sex in Southeast Asia and the Pacific Islands.
The document indicated that large numbers of South Korean girls and women have been trafficked to Japan, the U.S. and as far away as Western Europe.
On the flip side, many women from poorer Asian countries, particularly the Philippines, flock to South Korea to work as prostitutes and "bar girls" (lured by the promises of legitimate work as waitresses or entertainers).
For the record, the U.S. government prohibits American servicemen from patronizing bars and other establishments in South Korea served by prostitutes.
Blogger Park Je-Sun wrote on Threewisemonkeys that in Seoul, South Korea’s largest city, prostitution is widespread and peculiarly civilized -- and a central component of the local business culture.
“The majority of top-end -- that is, rich -- businessmen in Seoul are more familiar with sex-industry culture than in a number of other countries,” Park wrote.
“Sex and power are closely linked in this city.”
As an illustration of how widespread prostitution is in South Korea, consider that in January 2012 police raided a nine-story brothel in the upscale Gangnam neighborhood in Seoul and discovered no less than 100 prostitutes working there, ostensibly as "hostesses," who charged at least $300 for sex. This complex generated more than $200,000 every day, according to local media reports.
“It’s not uncommon for a hostess bar and a hotel to be located in the same building,” a policeman told the Korea Times.
In late 2006, the South Korean government took an unusual step to stamp out prostitution -- the Ministry for Gender Equality offered a cash incentive to companies whose male employees refrained from buying sex at office parties and business trips, an ingrained part of Korean corporate culture.
The prevalence of prostitution in contemporary South Korea provides an ironic counterpoint to the passionate political activism of elderly Korean women who relentlessly criticize Japan for forcing them into servitude as prostitutes and "comfort women" during Tokyo’s brutal occupation of their country.
Prostitution has a long history in South Korea, going back to the medieval period, when the “kisaeng,” female entertainers, were officially sanctioned by the ruling elite to perform all kinds of services, including sex.
Prostitution as a way of life continued in one form or another over the centuries, including during Japan’s occupation of Korea in the first half of the 20th century.
After World War II and the Korean War, the United States changed the face of prostitution.
Park Chung-hee, who ruled the country for most of the 1960s and 1970s, actually encouraged the sex trade in order to generate much-needed revenue, particularly at the expense of the thousands of U.S. troops stationed in the country.
“Our government was one big pimp for the U.S. military,” Kim Ae-ran, a former South Korean prostitute forced to work at an American military base, told the International Herald Tribune.
“They urged us to sell as much as possible to the G.I.’s, praising us as ‘dollar-earning patriots.'”
Another ex-prostitute lamented: “The more I think about my life, the more I think women like me were the biggest sacrifice for my country’s alliance with the Americans. Looking back, I think my body was not mine but the [South Korean] government’s and the U.S. military’s.”
In the 21st century, another source of prostitution comes from South Korea’s impoverished northern neighbor, North Korea.
Female defectors from North Korea – who typically reach South Korea after an arduous journey through a third country -- also sometimes descend into prostitution to survive.
Reportedly, many female North Korean defectors are forced into prostitution, not only to pay the exorbitant fees charged by people-smugglers, but to earn a living in South Korea -- sometimes this scenario leads to tragic consequences.
In March 2013, South Korean media reported on the case of a North Korean woman who was murdered while toiling as a sex worker in the city of Hwaseong, southwest of Seoul.
The killer, who turned himself in to police, confessed that he strangled the woman to death in a fit of anger when she refused to perform a “perverted” sex act. Compounding this tragedy of a desperate woman who fled repression and starvation in North Korea, it later emerged that her killer had no fewer than 16 previous convictions on his lengthy criminal record.
Now, in 2013, Korean courts are reportedly considering the constitutionality of the 2004 Special Law on Prostitution, which increased the penalties for both prostitution and pimping.
“It will be of great interest to see how the Special Law plays out in the courts and in the media,” wrote the blog, idleworship.net.
“It’s a $13 billion a year reality … and it’s not going anywhere.”